The Grey Terminal
WHERE CODE MEETS CAPITAL
Loading prices…
Powered by CoinGecko
Business & Venture

BonkDAO Wallet Investigation Uncovers Years-Old On-Chain Trails

Blockchain analysis traces attack wallets through BONK votes, Solana activity and exchange deposits.

BonkDAO Wallet Investigation Uncovers Years-Old On-Chain Trails

The wallets used in the $21 million BonkDAO governance attack did not begin their on-chain history with the proposal that emptied the DAO’s treasury. Public blockchain records reviewed by independent blockchain researcher Specter trace parts of the transaction history back to early 2023, intersecting with BONK governance activity, Solana protocols and exchange infrastructure years before the July 6 treasury transfer.

Key Takeaways
  • A trader executes a $21.2 million treasury drain from BonkDAO by passing a malicious governance proposal on the Solana network.
  • The attacker spent $4.4 million on Binance and Bybit to accumulate 882 billion BONK, exceeding the one percent quorum requirement.
  • This incident proves that BonkDAO governance serves as a primary attack surface for hostile takeovers without requiring software or protocol exploits.
Listen to this article
READY

The historical records do not identify who controlled the wallets during the governance vote. Instead, they broaden the transaction graph investigators are examining as they reconstruct the wallets’ activity before they appeared in BonkDAO’s governance system.

The Investigation Began After the Treasury Transfer

The attack itself has already been reconstructed through on-chain records.

On June 30, a proposal titled “Sowellian BonkDAO” (BIP-76) was submitted through Solana’s Realms governance platform. The proposal instructed BonkDAO to transfer 4,426,104,450,305 BONK, worth about $21 million at the time, to wallet 9bxW…JHvQ.

According to public blockchain records, wallets accumulated approximately 882 billion BONK over July 4 and 5, narrowly exceeding the DAO’s quorum requirement before voting in favor of the proposal on July 6. Once the proposal passed, the transfer executed automatically under BonkDAO’s governance rules.

Advertisement · Press Release

Have a development worth tracking?

Share product launches, funding announcements, partnerships, research findings and market developments with The Grey Terminal's readership.

→ Submit a Press Release

Hours later, Specter began tracing the wallets beyond the proposal itself. “A quick investigation into the Bonk governance attack found something interesting,” the researcher wrote on X before publishing a reconstruction of the wallets’ historical activity.

Based on Specter’s analysis, the proposal relied primarily on wallet CyEE7o…, which cast approximately 882.2 billion BONK, representing nearly all of the affirmative votes. A second wallet, FQnQYa…, contributed roughly 97.8 million BONK.

Shared Exchange Deposits Reveal Earlier Activity

Rather than stopping at the governance vote, Specter’s investigation followed the movement of funds after execution.

Analysis by the investigator revealed both voting wallets later transferred assets through the same cryptocurrency exchange deposit address. Tracing that address backward uncovered earlier transactions involving wallet 5zvDd3… and a publicly identified wallet belonging to crypto_notte, founder of Solana derivatives protocol Vyper Protocol.

The historical records include repeated deposits into the same exchange infrastructure between late 2022 and early 2024. Specter also identified a January 2024 transaction in which crypto_notte’s public wallet transferred 0.69 SOL to wallet 5zvDd3….

The blockchain transactions establish historical interactions among the wallets. They do not establish who controlled the addresses used in the BonkDAO governance proposal.

Earlier Realms Activity Appears in the Wallet Graph

The historical transaction graph also reaches back to one of the earliest public demonstrations of Solana’s Realms governance platform.

In January 2023, Dean Machine, founder of Realms, published a test proposal inviting users to vote with BONK tokens. The first participant would receive one DEANS token.

According to Specter’s reconstruction, wallet 5zvDd3… cast the first vote before receiving the token reward from Dean Machine. Dean later referenced the transaction publicly on X.

The activity predates the BonkDAO governance attack by more than three years and forms part of the broader wallet history identified during the investigation.

Vyper Transactions Add Another Historical Intersection

Specter’s analysis also identified historical activity involving Vyper Protocol.

According to the investigation, wallet 5zvDd3… interacted with Vyper’s over-the-counter program about 97 minutes before the protocol publicly announced a BONK prediction market on Jan. 4, 2023.

Specter described the timing as “interesting,” noting additional historical exposure between the wallet and Vyper-related activity.

The analysis does not conclude that the transaction indicates prior knowledge of the announcement or connects Vyper Protocol to the BonkDAO governance proposal.

Most of the Treasury Remains Visible On-Chain

The movement of the treasury remains publicly traceable.

Blockchain records show the proposal transferred 4.426 trillion BONK from BonkDAO’s treasury to wallet 9bxW…JHvQ before most of the balance was later moved to another wallet ending eh42.

According to blockchain analytics account Lookonchain, approximately 40 billion BONK, valued at roughly $188,000, has since been deposited to cryptocurrency exchange OKX, while the remaining balance, about 4.386 trillion BONK, remains visible in the receiving wallet.

BonkDAO has described the incident as a malicious governance proposal and said it has notified law enforcement while working with exchanges, bridge operators and the Solana Foundation to recover the assets and identify those responsible.

Grey Terminal Note

Blockchain investigations rarely begin with a name. They begin with transactions. Every governance vote, token transfer and exchange deposit becomes another point in a public ledger that investigators can revisit years later. The BonkDAO investigation illustrates both the strength and the limits of that transparency: blockchain records can reconstruct relationships between wallets over time, but they cannot, on their own, identify the person controlling an address or establish intent.

TERMINAL LAYER

Activate Terminal Layer

Structural analysis of the systems, pressures, and stakeholders behind this story.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

01

What is a governance attack in decentralized finance?

A governance attack is a maneuver where a participant acquires enough voting power to approve a proposal for personal gain. The BonkDAO incident used token-weighted voting to authorize a valid $21.2 million treasury transfer. This strategy targets the logical rules of a protocol rather than exploiting a bug in the code.
02

Why does this matter for the Solana ecosystem?

The BonkDAO drain demonstrates that large treasuries on Solana are vulnerable to hostile takeovers when voting power is liquid. Analysts at Lookonchain noted the attacker used open-market purchases to bypass the quorum threshold. Every decentralized protocol must now re-evaluate its voting requirements to prevent similar capital exfiltration.
03

How did the proposer execute the BIP #76 treasury drain?

The attacker submitted the proposal on June 30 and spent two days accumulating tokens on Binance. Once the voting period ended, the Solana-based Realms platform automatically executed the transfer instructions. On-chain records confirm 4.426 trillion BONK moved to the destination wallet specified in the measure.
04

What are the risks of using token-weighted voting?

Token-weighted voting creates a system where governance influence is a commodity that any capital-rich actor can buy on an exchange. This vulnerability allowed the Beanstalk protocol to be drained for $182 million in a similar fashion previously. If the cost of a quorum is lower than the treasury value, the DAO remains an attractive target for theft.
05

How will BonkDAO recover the stolen $21.2 million?

The organization has notified law enforcement and is coordinating with the Solana Foundation to identify the attacker's exchange accounts. While $188,000 was deposited to OKX, over $19 million in BONK tokens remain traceable in a single on-chain wallet. Community members are now debating whether to implement emergency veto powers for future high-value proposals.

You Might Also Like

THE GREY TERMINAL
🛡
Alex Reeve

Alex Reeve is a contributing writer for The Grey Terminal Her articles provide timely insights and analysis across these interconnected industries, including regulatory updates, market trends, token economics, institutional developments, platform innovations, stablecoins, meme coins, policy shifts, and the latest advancements in AI, applications, tools, models, and their broader implications for technology and markets.

The views and opinions expressed by the author in this article are her own and do not necessarily reflect the official position of The Grey Terminal, its management, editors, or affiliates. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions related to digital assets, cryptocurrencies, or financial matters. The Grey Terminal and its contributors are not responsible for any losses incurred from reliance on this information.