The Grey Terminal
WHERE CODE MEETS CAPITAL
Loading prices…
Powered by CoinGecko
Latest News

UFO Whistleblower David Grusch Claims ‘Multiple City Blocks’ Underwater Base With One Crucial Admission

David Grusch said the alleged site is large enough to span multiple city blocks, but said its origin is ‘indeterminate’ and he is not privy to further details

UFO Whistleblower David Grusch Claims ‘Multiple City Blocks’ Underwater Base With One Crucial Admission

Former Air Force intelligence officer and UAP whistleblower David Grusch has claimed people in the underwater community described a large ‘base of operations’ beneath the ocean that he said was ‘multiple city blocks’ in scale.

Key Takeaways
  • David Grusch claims naval contacts identified an underwater installation spanning multiple city blocks during a Joe Rogan podcast interview.
  • The Pentagon AARO March 2024 report found zero verifiable evidence of extraterrestrial technology or covert crash recovery programs.
  • Grusch provides no coordinates or physical records, classifying the origin as indeterminate while citing sensitive maritime operations.
Listen to this article
READY

Grusch made the remarks during an interview with Joe Rogan, host of The Joe Rogan Experience, published on September 30, 2026. He said the account involved ‘sensitive Navy underwater things’ and that he did not know when the alleged structure arrived. He also said its origin was ‘indeterminate’ and that he was ‘not privy’ to further information.

Grusch Said ‘Stuff Comes And Goes’ From The Alleged Base

Rogan asked whether the alleged underwater site was a waypoint. Grusch replied: ‘It’s like a base. Stuff comes and goes.’

Grusch said people he knew from the underwater community had compared the account with The Abyss, the 1989 science-fiction film starring Ed Harris. He said those people considered the film ‘kind of a docudrama’ and referred to ‘large stuff down there’.

Rogan asked whether behavioral analysis had been conducted and whether the mission had been worked out. Grusch said he did not know the answer and was ‘as curious as anybody’.

Advertisement · Press Release

Have a development worth tracking?

Share product launches, funding announcements, partnerships, research findings and market developments with The Grey Terminal's readership.

→ Submit a Press Release

The exchange did not identify a location or provide a document, image or other public record establishing the alleged installation. Grusch was also asked about the Baltic Sea anomaly, a sonar image publicized in 2011 that has prompted speculation about an underwater structure. He said there was ‘some interesting stuff there’ but that he would ‘allow the federal government to deal with that one’.

The Underwater Claim Was Not In Grusch’s 2023 Hearing

The underwater account was not part of Grusch’s public testimony before a House Oversight subcommittee on July 26, 2023.

Grusch, a former National Reconnaissance Office representative to the UAP Task Force, testified alongside former Navy commanding officer David Fravor and former Navy pilot Ryan Graves. The hearing examined unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), the US government’s term for objects or events that cannot immediately be identified.

During the hearing, Grusch alleged that people he said were involved in government programs had told him about a crash-retrieval and reverse-engineering effort involving UAP. He also said he had been informed that recovered ‘biologics’ were non-human.

The underwater-base account was instead presented during the September 30 podcast as information Grusch said he had heard from people in the underwater community.

AARO Found No Verifiable Evidence Of Extraterrestrial Technology

The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), the office responsible for investigating UAP reports, published the first volume of its Historical Record Report in March 2024.

AARO said it had found no verifiable evidence that the US government or private companies had access to or were reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology. It also said no US government investigation or official review had confirmed a UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology.

The report assessed alleged hidden UAP programs as nonexistent, misidentified national-security programs unrelated to extraterrestrial technology, or discontinued programs. Its review covered historical US government investigations and included records and interviews relating to claims of secret UAP programs.

AARO’s report did not specifically examine the underwater-base account Grusch described on Rogan.

Grusch Gave No Location Or Measurement

Grusch said information about tracking the underwater activity involved sensitive national-security matters. He also indicated that the US government might know more than he does, saying: ‘I’m sure we know a little bit more. I’m not privy to that.’

The ‘multiple city blocks’ description was Grusch’s comparison of the alleged site’s size. He did not provide a measurement or say that he had personally surveyed the structure.

The interview provided no location, date, document or image establishing the alleged base.

TERMINAL LAYER

Activate Terminal Layer

Structural analysis of the systems, pressures, and stakeholders behind this story.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

01

What is the underwater base described by David Grusch?

David Grusch describes an alleged submerged installation that contacts told him spans the size of multiple city blocks. He detailed the account on The Joe Rogan Experience, comparing the facility to operations depicted in science fiction. Grusch stated that its origin remains indeterminate and provided no exact geographic coordinates.
02

Why does this claim matter for the defense community?

Submerged anomaly reports expand military oversight beyond airspace surveillance to US Navy ocean monitoring systems. Grusch previously served as the National Reconnaissance Office representative to the government UAP Task Force. Public assertions regarding covert maritime installations increase political pressure on congressional oversight committees.
03

When did David Grusch formally testify before Congress?

David Grusch testified under oath before the House Oversight subcommittee on July 26, 2023. His formal testimony addressed alleged crash-retrieval programs and non-human biologics without detailing underwater installations. The ocean base claims surfaced during later broadcast interviews rather than official congressional hearings.
04

What evidence contradicts the claims made by David Grusch?

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office published a historical review in March 2024 showing zero evidence of extraterrestrial material. Pentagon researchers found that cited covert initiatives were authentic, misidentified national security programs. The lack of sonar telemetry, photographs, or official documentation leaves the maritime claims uncorroborated.
05

How does the Pentagon investigate unidentified maritime objects?

The Department of Defense routes all reported transmedium sightings through the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office. Investigators assess military sensor records, classified sonar readings, and historical defense archives to evaluate each encounter. Official findings attribute documented incidents to conventional sovereign technology or environmental clutter.

You Might Also Like

THE GREY TERMINAL
🛡
Alex Reeve

Alex Reeve is a contributing writer for The Grey Terminal Her articles provide timely insights and analysis across these interconnected industries, including regulatory updates, market trends, token economics, institutional developments, platform innovations, stablecoins, meme coins, policy shifts, and the latest advancements in AI, applications, tools, models, and their broader implications for technology and markets.

○ The views and opinions expressed by the author in this article are her own and do not necessarily reflect the official position of The Grey Terminal, its management, editors, or affiliates. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions related to digital assets, cryptocurrencies, or financial matters. The Grey Terminal and its contributors are not responsible for any losses incurred from reliance on this information.