The Grey Terminal
WHERE CODE MEETS CAPITAL
Loading prices…
Powered by CoinGecko
Business & Venture

Celsius Sent 350 Bitcoin to Top Up a BitMEX Position; 8 Minutes Later, It Was Liquidated. Estate Sues

The Celsius estate is seeking 6,360 Bitcoin over two March 2020 liquidations, including a second position that lost more than 5,000 BTC.

Celsius Sent 350 Bitcoin to Top Up a BitMEX Position; 8 Minutes Later, It Was Liquidated. Estate Sues

Celsius began sending 350 Bitcoin to BitMEX at 23:47:07 UTC on March 12, 2020, as additional margin for a long XBTM20 futures position. Eight minutes later, BitMEX had placed a liquidation order on the position, according to a lawsuit filed by the Celsius estate in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

Key Takeaways
  • The Celsius bankruptcy estate sues BitMEX to recover 6,360 Bitcoin lost during disputed March 2020 derivatives market liquidations.
  • BitMEX triggered liquidation protocols within eight minutes of an unconfirmed 350 BTC deposit arriving in company transaction queues.
  • Litigation targets BitMEX insurance fund mechanisms eleven days before the derivatives trading platform permanently shutters global exchange operations.
Listen to this article
READY

The complaint, filed September 12, 2026, by Celsius Network Limited and Celsius Network LLC through Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium, the estate’s litigation administrator, says BitMEX emailed at 23:52:30 that it had seen the incoming transfer but that it remained unconfirmed. The email said confirmation normally took 10 to 20 minutes or longer.

At 23:54:26, the contract’s mark price crossed the maintenance-margin threshold of $4,020.5. Seven seconds later, BitMEX placed the liquidation order, the complaint says. The position was liquidated at an average price of $3,634.50, producing a claimed loss of 1,325.8385 BTC.

The 350 BTC transfer confirmed on-chain at about 23:55, after liquidation had begun. A separate BitMEX credit to the account is alleged to have occurred at 00:01:28 UTC.

The estate argues that BitMEX had seen the incoming collateral but liquidated the position before the deposit was confirmed and credited. That allegation has not been tested in court.

Advertisement · Press Release

Have a development worth tracking?

Share product launches, funding announcements, partnerships, research findings and market developments with The Grey Terminal's readership.

→ Submit a Press Release

A Second Position Was Liquidated for 5,034 Bitcoin

At 02:50:28 UTC on March 13, a position held through JST Alpha 1 was liquidated at an average price of $3,062.61, according to the complaint. The claimed loss was 5,034.3281 BTC.

JST Alpha 1 Ltd. was a Cayman Islands feeder fund for JST Alpha 1 Master Fund Ltd., managed by JST Asset Management LLC. Celsius had subscribed into the feeder. The estate says the trading was conducted on Celsius’s behalf.

The complaint points to a price gap in the same minute as the liquidation. It says the best ask was $4,502 while the mark price used for the liquidation was $3,422. The estate says that print could not be rationally explained by trading.

Both Cayman funds were struck off the Cayman Islands General Registry on January 31, 2022. On April 23, 2025, JST Alpha 1 Ltd., JST Alpha 1 Master Fund Ltd., and JST Asset Management LLC assigned their claims relating to the losses to Celsius Network Limited and Celsius Network LLC.

The two liquidations total 6,360.1666 BTC.

Mashinsky Said Celsius Was Not a Trader

Later on March 13, after both positions had already been liquidated, Celsius founder and former CEO Alex Mashinsky recorded a market commentary video in which he told viewers Celsius was “not a trader.”

“We don’t trade. We don’t buy and sell coins. We don’t decide, oh, BTC’s going up or down,” Mashinsky said.

The estate is now suing over a directional BitMEX Bitcoin futures position held during that market collapse. The complaint does not establish who authorized that particular trade.

Mashinsky later pleaded guilty to commodities and securities fraud and was sentenced to 12 years in prison in May 2025. The Justice Department said his fraud involved misleading Celsius customers and manipulating the price of its CEL token.

The Insurance Fund Is Part of the Claim

The estate is also seeking disgorgement of profits it says were attributable to the challenged liquidations.

BitMEX said in a March 22, 2020 explanation that its insurance fund grew by 4,457 XBT during the March 12–13 market event and reached an intraday peak of 37,836 XBT. BitMEX said the liquidation engine exited some positions above their average entry price, adding to the insurance fund, and that the fund could also absorb losses.

The estate argues that the system gave BitMEX an economic interest in the disputed liquidations and asks the court to return the 6,360.1666 BTC or its value, along with disgorgement and other damages. Those are claims for relief, not findings that BitMEX manipulated the market or improperly took Celsius’s assets.

The defendants are HDR Global Trading Limited, ABS Global Trading Limited, 100x Holdings Limited, Shine Effort Inc. Limited, and HDR Global Services (Bermuda) Limited.

BitMEX is due to close its exchange operations on September 23, 2026, at 04:00 UTC. Since August 26, users have been restricted to reducing positions, with all remaining positions scheduled to be force-closed at closure.

The Celsius complaint was filed 11 days before that shutdown. The allegations remain untested in court.

TERMINAL LAYER

Activate Terminal Layer

Structural analysis of the systems, pressures, and stakeholders behind this story.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

01

What is the Celsius estate lawsuit against BitMEX?

The Celsius bankruptcy estate filed a civil recovery complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing seeks restitution for 6,360 Bitcoin liquidated across two leveraged positions during the March 2020 market crash. Litigation administrator Blockchain Recovery Investment Consortium named HDR Global Trading Limited and related entities as corporate defendants.
02

Why do the disputed March 2020 liquidations matter for crypto derivatives?

The legal challenge examines whether automated liquidation engines unfairly enrich exchange insurance funds during acute liquidity contractions. BitMEX acknowledged that its native insurance fund absorbed 4,457 Bitcoin during the historic market volatility window. The case establishes critical judicial precedent regarding exchange fiduciary responsibilities when processing unconfirmed blockchain margin top-ups.
03

How did BitMEX execute the disputed Celsius position liquidation?

Celsius initiated a 350 Bitcoin transfer to replenish maintenance margin requirements at 23:47 UTC on March 12, 2020. BitMEX acknowledged viewing the incoming transaction queue before triggering forced liquidation orders seven minutes later at $3,634.50. The on-chain collateral transfer confirmed within minutes after the automated execution engine wiped out the position.
04

What contradictions exist regarding Alex Mashinsky's historical trading claims?

Former chief executive Alex Mashinsky publicly claimed on March 13, 2020, that Celsius never engaged in directional cryptocurrency trading. Bankruptcy court filings contradict those public statements by documenting massive leveraged long futures positions on BitMEX platforms. Mashinsky received a twelve-year federal prison sentence in May 2025 after pleading guilty to commodities fraud and customer deception.
05

How does the BitMEX operational shutdown affect the bankruptcy lawsuit?

BitMEX scheduled the complete cessation of all commercial exchange operations for September 23, 2026. The Celsius litigation was filed eleven days before the platform permanently force-closes outstanding market positions. The estate seeks direct financial disgorgement against offshore parent holding entities including 100x Holdings and HDR Global Services.

You Might Also Like

THE GREY TERMINAL
🛡
Alex Reeve

Alex Reeve is a contributing writer for The Grey Terminal Her articles provide timely insights and analysis across these interconnected industries, including regulatory updates, market trends, token economics, institutional developments, platform innovations, stablecoins, meme coins, policy shifts, and the latest advancements in AI, applications, tools, models, and their broader implications for technology and markets.

The views and opinions expressed by the author in this article are her own and do not necessarily reflect the official position of The Grey Terminal, its management, editors, or affiliates. This content is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions related to digital assets, cryptocurrencies, or financial matters. The Grey Terminal and its contributors are not responsible for any losses incurred from reliance on this information.